Duty Calls

[aide-de-camp]

A taste of Hell. Really, we've got a Hell here. It contains a single thread which I don't bother to keep tidy.

When I said 'fark off' that wasn't a heat of the moment thing. I think your heart is cold - just like a fascist.

An oldie but a goodie.

Gender again. Sorry!
It's been a few months. Big news!

I choose to be defined by my clothing.

Considering how Bromptonaut defines women, that's hardly news. This, on the other hand, qualifies:

Bye everyone! Signing out for good as I've spent much longer here than I intended, and I have other things I need to be doing.

So many wells to poison, so little time.

Did he see the writing on the wall for gender ideology? Run out of precious bodily fluids for Starmer?*

Fare thee well. Haven't always seen eye to eye, but (most of) your input will be a loss to the forum.

*"semen for Starmer" is catchier but yuckier

Always sad when people choose the dick side.

Speaking of Andys, CXRAndy has turned into a deleted member. More ghosts every time I stop back.

bobzmyunkle's succinctness leapt out at me:

Jesus wept.
In the old days it was simple. Sex is binary, gender is a social construct. Fill your boots however you feel gender wise. Now, after 15,000,000 pages of ^{obfuscatory drivel} from @monkers and her imaginary friends, @Ian H realises that gender isn't a binary relationship with sex.

moNkers's sockpuppetry induced the usual credulity:

FFS why would @monkers do that. Why can't we just take people at face value?

This. 100% this. Why would anyone bother with an alter on this little slice of the internet?

To borrow a phrase beloved of Mumsnet: Oh my sweet summer child. Trans Rights Privileges Activists operate on a whole different level of trolldom. moNkers is on a mission to eradicate fact, wherever it exists, with bad fiction.

As we go to press, N's latest disgorgement "Received by email this morning" _{for added verisimilitude} is being ignored.

Listen dickhead

I suppose the litany of insults spewed at Aurora is nearly invisible to the regulars at this point. To anyone still noticing, it looks desperately unhinged.

How do you create a fauxgina?

[video of 'gender surgeon']

Inverted penis has its glans fans.

Maybe you didn't hear him say that the vagina of a trans woman [sic] is sensate end to end, and that our's are not.

Man wins best womaning contest, this time using the only metric that matters:

Might want to take that claim with a generous helping of salt; in any event, note that "sensate" ain't always a good thing.

"Sensate end to end" caused my wife, who outrageously has accused me of finding NACA cozy as an old chair, particular amusement.

who are you, other than a woman with a fetishistic obsession with other people's genitals?

Says the person who just posted a video about genitals.

Aurora thinks she's winning just because she has ground everybody down.

Says the one who grinds. It must be incredibly frustrating it's not working here.

You make every conversation so very farking tedious and manipulative.

It's as if moNkers is talking to moNkerself. Wait a minute...

Spoiler

Faithful readers will be aware of my fond wish that AuroraSaab is actually moNkers, a master sockpuppeteer running rings around all of us. Today I unveil my darkest fear that all of them are actually me, which would explain the trance-like state my wife continually has to shake me out of.

[close]

Stop press!

N here

Sorry I've filled the forum pages too much this evening; and so to bed.

"That ought to silence the naysayers!" A reminder that some people on little slices of the internet write entire books. They may be self-published, but they're still books.

[close]

Namecheck

Hi Sam! Hope the holiday is going ok. I'm not in touch with Sam but I could help him out with his forum game of Guess Who if I wasn't opposed to doxing.

I'll pass your greetings along. We don't think our identikit skills qualify as doxxing, but promise if you get in touch we won't use information in a way which makes you uncomfortable.

You're never going to get in touch, are you.

I just won't be joining in with the pretending.

Words to live by.

you can't reason with crazy

Also words to live by.

Oh fark off. I'm generally very kind to everyone and known for it.

[Readit & Weep]

Reginald Weep here, posting in an unofficial capacity. In my spare time when I'm not clubbing foxes (I jest, unlike Jolyon Maugham, whom I once saw bite the head off a chicken on a retreat), I enjoy visiting forums. Have been following the exploits of the shrinking population of 'NACA' for some time now. This exchange yesterday is remarkable. Abridged.

https://ncap.cyclechat.net/threads/gender-again-sorry.273/page-1057#post-103379

What can be alleged in respect of your actions is, in simplest terms, cyberbullying, and falls under the legal definition of harassment. From your own words, it is clear that you consider the harassment of trans women to be acceptable on the basis that you feel that you are entitled to do so as a cisgender woman. You couldn't be more wrong. This is clearly criminal intent and criminal behaviour.

Cyber bullies are easily spotted, when a victim complains about their behaviour, typically they reply with a meme, say a woman spraying her keyboard with tea because she is laughing so hard, or just replying 'Lol', indicating that they are admitting enjoying causing distress. It is an admission of guilt.

Co-conspirator

Cyberbullying on social media is at contagion level. Cyber bullies tend to think that either the state does not have the means to identify (invariably it does), however a consideration is interstate bullying. In the UK it is much more difficult to seek remedy against a bully in say the USA because international law to tackle the problem is not established. However you are from what you seem to say resident in the UK bullying on what I think is a UK based website. There are obligations on the site owner to protect people from bullying on the site. I believe the site owner is aware since they ask posters to hide behind avatars.

Will the police take action against you? I will say it is unlikely. First there needs to be a complaint made to UK police, and secondly because of the lack of resources (including court time) means that their interest will only be piqued by a higher level of harm. However a person taking their own life or self-harming following on-line interactions with you and citing your avatar would lead to an investigation into your behaviour with possible consequences.

The ability to hide from the authorities does not make the behaviour less criminal.

The point of your huge post is to try to stop people commenting on this thread. I doubt it is only meant for my ears.

It's the next step on from when you used to post 'My lawyer cousin is watching this thread'. In my opinion it's threatening both the site owner and posters. It's an attempt to intimidate because all else has failed.

The stark reality is that you have realised that your own behaviour is indeed criminal.

I'm not intimidated. Hope that helps. The more you post the dafter you look. In my opinion, of course.

you do not merely attempt behaviour which could be found to be criminal in law, you succeed.

I must have missed the "lawyer cousin", and my aide is unable to locate it in a seach. There was this, however, from last December. If memory serves, it was N's first post. 'Pale Rider' covered it at the time during the most enjoyable Gender Actually thread arc.

Please can you kindly explain the reason for your contributions that could be argued as incitement to commit an offence? I feel quite certain that your ultimate employer, the NHS, would be concerned to see you acting in this manner.

For the record, I am willing to take on 'AuroraSaab' as a client, pro bono, should she require legal representation in this matter.

Another satisfied client