Author Topic: 20 Questions with Ian

sam

20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #80 on: December 10, 2024 »
Assisted dying? I’m not sure where [entropy is coming: repent] stands against unassisted dying, which I presume is the sort of outcome the terminally clumsy might have in a tryst with a lawnmower and thunderstorm.

Sounds like it could be an installation at the Tate Modern.

Where do you stand on modern art? How do you define it? Do you have a favourite piece, or one you would like to run over with a lawnmower in a thunderstorm?

Pick a question, any question.


Well it was modern at the time




That's more like it

On edit about 5 minutes later:
The thing about art is that it's the essence of blag. If you express admiration for something with enough confidence you undermine everyone else and they start to reconsider their opinion.

<Cough> Fortunately I think the questions I've asked above merely invite you to expand on that. Besides,


finestre

  • alter ego
Re: 20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #81 on: December 10, 2024 »
There is art that is genuinely good, it’s not just the stuff you couldn’t do yourself, it’s the stuff you often couldn’t even conceive of doing. That’s not just technique, it’s the concept. Even if you could technically pull it off (which you can’t), you wouldn’t think to do it that way. A lot of modern stuff, on the other hand, doesn’t pass that test, but it’s not a total loss if it exists to introduce you to a thought, even if that thought eventually declares ‘this is crap, really, isn’t it?’ Does it have the endearing value of a Vermeer? I doubt. In many case though it disappears on an adventure in self-proctology where it just tries too hard and fails and doesn’t have the technically goodness to fail back on since it’s the grown-up equivalent of using sprinkles and child-safe glue. It’s like those posh school white kids who put on the road man accent to try and make themselves sound like they’re fresh outta Peckham.

I hold with my comment on blag, you can make people think twice about even the worst, more unredeemable piece of art, if you bestow your positive judgement with enough confidence. It’s a superpower. This works for most things, a while ago I started to use this power with wine. I know nothing about wine beyond there’s red and there’s white but if you confidently order a random bottle, treat it with enough ceremony, and then gush it’s praises, people will align even if it’s pretty average. Many people live in fear of being discovered. It's just fermented grape juice kids.

Not sure this would work with the Bulgarian Country Wine that was my undergraduate staple though. It was a broadly established fact that in enough quantity it could have been used to dissolve a battleship. It often tasted like it already had.

sam

20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #82 on: December 16, 2024 »
Have you ever suffered from dartitis or the equivalent?

finestre

  • alter ego
Re: 20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #83 on: December 24, 2024 »
I can't do darts or any kind of throw-age. Because I refused to wear an eyepatch as a child, I have no depth vision and a life-long aversion to piracy. My eyes often don't entirely agree on where to look, which mean I tend to favour one at a time. It's an interesting question as to where the vision input from the other is going. Does it turn off or is there a part of brain that has become autonomous and revels in this? I'm the sort of daydreamer who can get places without any knowledge of the journey so I think there might be possibility that this consciousness will be overthrown one day, and the new me will debut on the wake of that coup. Oh well, it might be fun. I've always been a skeptic of the entire multiple personality disorder thing so that will also be me hoisted on my own petard.

But whichever me is in charge, I wouldn't stand anywhere within dart-range of the board if I'm throwing unless you want your own William Burroughs moment.

sam

20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #84 on: December 26, 2024 »
If memory serves, you have written a book, or made significant progress on one, but set it aside. Can you tell me anything about it?

finestre

  • alter ego
Re: 20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #85 on: January 04, 2025 »
Writing for an audience of one is my hobby, so I’ve written a couple of novels and a few volumes of quirky short stories. I always was an imaginative child, and I didn’t really grow up. Are they books anyone other than me would read? My wife has read a few and, under torture, confessed they were good, but she also made some comments about the things that happen in my head and the value of psychological counselling. I have no big plans to get them published; the pleasure is in the emptying of my brain onto the virtual page and giving the characters the life they deserve. Short stories are easy, but bringing an entire novel together is quite an intellectual challenge. More so, if like me, you don’t actually plan anything. I bring the characters into being and let them sort it out. I set the benchmark of intellectual laziness.

I’m on the third part of a sci-fi trilogy that I wrote because I was angry about bloody trilogies and why can’t they just write the one book and get it over with? So I dared myself. There’s nothing original to it, and in that there’s comfort. It’s like a familiar bed to lie in. It’s about a guy called Rourke who is cursed to do the right things for the wrong reasons, or possibly vice versa. There’s a universe-ending peril because there always is. Rourke really isn’t the man to save the universe. There’s a lot of robots because there always are, and a lot of spaceships, because well, it’s sci-fi. I’m writing the book I’d want to read. We’re doing time travel at the moment, unpicking the first two volumes and giving myself a creative migraine. Rourke really isn’t the best character, but that’s because, like all protagonists, he’s the author. Skyr is my favourite; she’s an android who looks like a nine-year-old girl and has chromium eyes and a fondness for dangerous weaponry and the sort of scheming that would make Machiavelli step back and raise his hands and say ‘whoo, too much.’ I’m pretty sure they’ll save the universe in the end. No, I’d not heard that Skyr was a yoghurt product until I’d started writing it. Damned Icelanders.

Finestre, of course, is a character that belongs somewhere else. I’m on the third book of that, and Finestre came in as a side character. That’s Jezebel’s story, though she thinks her parents should have read the Bible, so she’s Jess, once-upon-a-time librarian in South London who got murdered in a plot to spring a demi-god from his prison dimension (I can’t explain it in fewer than three hundred thousand words, sorry). While that worked, he didn’t quite bargain on what Jess became. She’s basically my take on a vampire and, yes, she’s awesome and she’s saved the universe twice and will save it some more. She’s gone off the rails at the moment, but I think we’ll have her back on-side. There’s a trio of angelic assassins who are finding their way out of being amoral killing machines: Sisley and Sybil, and Sisley’s sister, Sarla, who really got Jess killed in the first place, but now hangs around her flat and drinks her wine. Did I forget the demi-god she inadvertently sprung, that was Jist, and he’s now dead. Jist’s sister is Finestre, and she’s the queen of Hell on account she killed everything else. We think. She’s the Devil anyway. She had another brother, Barabos, but he was volume 2, and Jess had to kill him too. The archangel Gabriel who made the mistake of siding with Barabos. She had to drink Finestre’s blood to make that so, which is why she’s currently off the rails. The Devil is a rich pudding. There’s a lot of killing and even more sarcasm. I never went to Sunday School, so I’m not sure my take on Hell and Heaven are kosher. It’s a gloriously stupid romp. It features Death himself, a board-game playing serial killer called Martin, his ex Julie who is now Jess’s on-off BFF and incidentally a ghost as Sarla got her killed too. There are talking crows and Elephant and Castle is a hell-portal. Many, many heads have been pulled, torn, and cut-off. Everyone has a bloody good time. Jess is currently slaughtering her way through London’s criminal underworld. Sarla got herself into the police force through the deal with Finestre, Sybil is in Heaven, Sisley in the realm of the Dead, and Julie has been kidnapped by an army of corrupted angels who want to take over our world and eat us.

20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #86 on: January 09, 2025 »
Writing for an audience of one is my hobby

You've certainly come to the right place.

Quote
I’m writing the book I’d want to read.

What else do you like to read?
What writers have influenced you?
Was Elephant and Castle built on a pre-existing hell portal, or did the works of man darkly consecrate the ground?

finestre

  • alter ego
Re: 20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #87 on: January 29, 2025 »
Good question about Elephant Castle, I feel the manically pedalled swirl around the roundabout during my youthful cycling adventures was, in some part, due to an ancient innate evil working below the ground. A force of diabolical gravity felt most profoundly by cyclists trying to orbit the dread circle. I did occasionally ponder, as a lorry crossed my crave whether the shopping centre would be my final mortal vista. Hell of a way to go. It wasn't as bad as the Lombardy Circle of Death on the A23, but that's because the latter features the Drivers of Croydon, for whom driving around Hell is a normal commute.

I'm not sure recent gentrification has entirely dispelled the sulphurous rumours that something lurks below.

I don't often play a game of favourites when I come to authors. I have David Foster Wallace and James Joyce so I don't have to do it again. I read a lot of trash. I was once caught in a snowstorm in Durango, CO and forced to read the entire Book of Mormon. Twice. It goes better with vodka miniatures.

20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #88 on: January 31, 2025 »
Have you seen Heretic?


finestre

  • alter ego
Re: 20 Questions with Ian
« Reply #89 on: February 05, 2025 »
I have not, though I would like to. A shame Jar-Jar never got to reprise his role. Honestly, I gave up with Star Wars some time ago, despite it (and Indiana Jones) being the ground rocks of my childhood (enjoyed while sucking the orange dye our of frozen Kia-Ora lollies in the Heanor ABC, which is of course now, another block of identikit fuck-hutches for the downwardly mobile). I have a deep seated disappointment that I never got a Millennium Falcon. I did see some of the later movies, but nothing of them stuck on my mind, like they were made out of some kind of next-gen teflon. I do remember the CGI Princess Leia Mary Poppins scene. It's one of those movie moments where you realise that hundreds of people have been engaged in producing that scene, they've all seen it, and not one of them uttered the words 'make this stop.'

I did get some cheap tickets to see Elektra and The Tempest last week, this year's season of Hollywood types sojourning on the London stage. They're generally not very good, but I like a curiosity.

Elektra was mostly terrible, only enlivened by the fact that I managed to convince a credulous friend that Brie Larson's brother is named Camembert before the show and I know she spent 75 minutes aching to google this. It's Milo, apparently, and I'm 'a dick.'

Pitches Elektra as an angry punk which isn't a bad take, and Larson puts the effort in with a buzz cut and Bikini Kills t-shirt. That said, she would have been about eight when Bikini Kills disbanded, so age wasn't on her side. If they'd played the punk angle faithfully, it might have worked, but it dissolved into gimmickry, with Brie clutching a mike and doing some semblance of slam poetry and, for reasons unclear, always singing the word 'no' while stomping a distortion pedal. For more reasons unclear every name was accompanied by a sound effect, for instance there was a strange offstage crash every time she mentioned Agamemnon / father, which the first time, everyone assumed was a clumsy stagehand. That quickly evolved through amusing to annoying. Also there was a Zeppelin above the stage. As a plus, the chorus were good and I quite liked the tv reportage ending of the familicide. It would have been improved by not having the victims still on stage and evidently alive though. Maybe they ran out of money for theatrical blood. If you going to do the Greeks, buy a 50 gallon drum and splash it around. Everyone always dies, usually after or during incest.

The Tempest features Signourney Weaver. It was a bit better, but a reminder that those Hollywood types don't have the chops for theatre. The average Brit stage pounder can give the back of the gods earache. I wouldn't want Ian McKellen to shout at me, I reckon he could make your insides fall out. The Americans always have to be miked up. Even the delightful Amy Adams last year, though to be honest, and I'm sorry dear wife, I was mostly listening with my eyes.

Again, for reasons unclear, she spent most of the performance sitting on a chair and looking a bit broody. Prospero should be a trickster, a devious schema, only in the end realising that there's no real value to those schemes and making good. She was less acting, more reading the lines. A shame as the staging was genuinely very good, Stefano and Trinculo stole their comedic scenes (though somewhat knocking the somber pace elsewhere, as though the scenes might have fallen from an alternate production), Arial was excellent, as was the gimpy Caliban. Maybe someone should have let an alien on stage. Shakespeare needed more aliens. Maybe Tarantino, before he disappeared up his own fundament, should have done Titus Andronicus. A missed opportunity, it truly is the grind-house horror of Shakey's back catalogue.

All a bit of a shame, more so after a luminous Midsummer Night's Dream at the Barbican a few weeks before.